MONTHLY
EM&A report
February 2017
Client
: Civil Engineering and Development
Department, HKSAR
Contract
No. : KLN/2015/07
Contract
Name : Environmental
Monitoring Works for
Contract KL/2014/03 ¡V Kai Tak Development
¡V Stage 3 Infrastructure Works for
Developments
at the Southern Part of the Former Runway
Report No. : 0405/15/ED/0733A
EP-337/2009 New
Distributor Roads Serving the Planned Kai Tak Development Area
EP-339/2009/A Decommissioning
of the Remaining Parts (Ex-GFS
Building,
Radar Station and Hong Kong Aviation Club)
of
the former Kai Tak Airport
EP-451/2013 Trunk Road T2
Prepared by : Alfred
Y. S. Lam
Reviewed by : Cyrus
C. Y. Lai
![]()
Certified by : ___________________
Colin K. L. Yung
Environmental
Team Leader
MateriaLab
Consultants Limited
TABLE OF CONTENTS
7. ENVIRONMENTAL
COMPLAINT AND NON-COMPLIANCE
8. IMPLEMENTATION
STATUS OF ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION MEASURES
FIGURES
Figure 1 Project General Layout
Figure 2 Air
and Noise Monitoring Locations
LIST OF APPENDICES
|
Appendix
A |
Construction
Programme |
|
Appendix
B |
Project Organization Chart |
|
Appendix
C |
Action
and Limit Levels for Air Quality and Noise |
|
Appendix
D |
Calibration
Certificates of Monitoring Equipment |
|
Appendix
E |
Environmental
Monitoring Schedules |
|
Appendix
F |
Air
Quality Monitoring Data |
|
Appendix
G |
Noise
Monitoring Data |
|
Appendix
H |
Event
Action Plans |
|
Appendix
I |
Waste Flow Table |
|
Appendix
J |
Environmental
Mitigation Implementation Schedule (EMIS) |
|
Appendix K |
Weather
and Meteorological Conditions during Reporting Month |
|
Appendix
L |
Cumulative
statistics on Environmental Complaints, Notifications of Summons and
Successful Prosecutions |
|
Appendix M |
Summary
of Site Audit in the Reporting Month |
|
Appendix N |
Outstanding
Issues and Deficiencies |
|
|
|
i.
The
Civil Engineering and Development Department HKSAR has appointed MateriaLab
Consultants Limited (MCL) to undertake the Environmental Team services for the
Project and implement the EM&A works.
ii.
This
Monthly EM&A report presents the environmental monitoring and audit works
for the period between 1 February 2017 and 28 February 2017. As informed by the
Contractor, major activities in the reporting month were:
Temporary utility diversion;
Implementation of Temporary Traffic
Arragement (TTA);
Construction of Tunnel structure;
Construction of Subway B;
Construction of guide walls and D-walls;
and
Construction of District Cooling System
Works.
Breaches of the Action and Limit Levels
iii.
No Action / Limit
Level exceedance was recorded for 24-hr TSP and construction noise at KTD1a,
KTD2a and KER1b in the reporting month.
Complaint,
Notification of Summons and Successful Prosecution
iv.
A complaint received
on 9 February 2017 was referred from EPD on 21 February 2017 and summarized as
below:
No car washing machine was found in the
construction site near the gate of former Radar Tower (hereinafter referred to
as ¡§the Site¡¨).
Dust was observed when
the vehicle leaving and entering the Site.
The notification of complaint was received by ET on 22 February 2017.
Reporting
Changes
v.
There was no
reporting change in the reporting month.
Future
Key Issues
vi. The key issues to be considered in the
coming reporting month include:
Potential environmental impacts arising from
the above construction activities are mainly associated with construction dust,
construction noise, water quality, waste management and landscape and visual
impact.
1.1.1
The
Kai Tak Development is located in the south-eastern part of Kowloon Peninsula
of the HKSAR, comprising the apron and runway areas of the former Kai Tak
Airport and existing waterfront areas at To Kwa Wan, Ma Tau Kok, Kowloon Bay,
Kwun Tong and Cha Kwo Ling.
1.1.2
Contract
No. KL/2014/03 is the works package to construct an approximately 420m long
supporting underground structure (SUS) underneath Shing Cheong Road and Cheung
Yip Street. The EM&A programme under this Contract is governed by three EPs
(EP-337/2009, EP-339/2009/A and EP-451/2013) and two EM&A Manuals
(AEIAR-130/2009 and AEIAR-174/2013). The Works to be executed under this
Contract and corresponding EPs include but not be limited to the following main
items:
EP-451/2013 ¡V Trunk Road T2
(i)
Construction
of approximately 420m long supporting underground structure (SUS) including
diaphragm walls, barrettes, piled foundation, top and bottom slabs, end wall
and adits underneath Shing Cheong Road and Cheung Yip Street;
EP-337/2009 ¡V New Distributor Roads
Serving the Planned Kai Tak Development
(ii)
Widening
and re-alignment of Cheung Yip Street of approximately 330m long and associated
footpaths;
(iii)
Demolition,
reconstruction and widening of Shing Cheong Road of approximately 410m long and
associated footpaths;
(iv)
Construction
of drainage outfall and modification of existing seawall;
(v)
Construction
of ancillary works including surface drainage, sewerage, water, fire fighting,
street lighting, street furniture, road marking, road signage, utilities and
services, irrigation and landscape works.
EP-339/2009/A
¡V Decommissioning of the Remaining Parts (Ex-GFS Building, Radar Station and
Hong Kong Aviation Club) of the former Kai Tak Airport
(vi)
Demolition
of RADAR Tower and guard house;
Other works not covered by any EP
(vii)
Construction
of two subways between Phase II of New Acute Hospital (Site A) and Hong Kong
Children¡¦s Hospital (Site C), and between Phase I of New Acute Hospital (Site
B) and Site C;
(viii)
Construction
of District Cooling System (DCS) along Cheung Yip Street and Shing Cheong Road
1.1.3
The
location and boundary of the site is shown in Figure 1.
1.2.1
The
project proponent was the Civil Engineering and Development Department, HKSAR
(CEDD). Hyder Meinhardt Joint Venture (HMJV) was commissioned by CEDD as the
Engineer for the Project. Ramboll Environ Hong Kong Limited was commissioned as
the Independent Environmental Checker (IEC). China Road and Bridge Corporation
(Hong Kong) (CRBC) was appointed as the main contractor for the construction
works under the contract KL/2014/03. MateriaLab Consultants Limited (MCL) was
appointed as the Environmental Team (ET) by CEDD to implement the EM&A
programme for the Project.
1.2.2
The
organization structure is shown in Appendix
B. The key personnel contact names and numbers for the Project are
summarized in Table 1.1.
Table 1.1 Contact
Information of Key Personnel
|
Party |
Position |
Name |
Telephone |
Fax |
|
Project
Proponent (CEDD) |
Co-ordinator |
Ms. Amy Chu |
3106 3172 |
2369 4980 |
|
Engineer¡¦s
Representative (HMJV) |
Chief Resident
Engineer |
Mr. W. K.,
Chris Wong |
3742 3803 |
3742 3899 |
|
IEC (Ramboll
Environ Hong Kong Limited) |
Independent
Environmental Checker |
Mr. F. C.
Tsang |
3465 2851 |
3465 2899 |
|
Main
Contractor (CRBC) |
Site Agent |
Mr. Chan
See Wai, Arnold |
9380 4110 |
2283 1689 |
|
Environmental
Officer |
Mr. Andy
Choy |
6278 2693 |
2283 1689 |
|
|
ET (MCL) |
Environmental
Team Leader |
Mr. Colin
Yung |
3565 4114 |
3565 4160 |
1.3.1
The
construction of the Project commenced in February 2016 and is expected to
complete in 2020. The construction programme is shown in Appendix A.
1.3.2
A summary of the
major construction activities undertaken in the reporting month were:
Temporary utility diversion;
Implementation of Temporary Traffic
Arragement (TTA);
Construction of Tunnel structure;
Construction of Subway B;
Construction of guide walls and D-walls;
and
Construction of District Cooling System
Works.
1.4.1
According
to the construction activities in the construction programme mentioned in
Section 1.3.2, the following environmental protection/ mitigation measures
including Air Quality Impact, Construction Noise Impact, Water Quality Impact,
Chemical and Waste Management, Landscape and Visual Impact shall be implemented:
Sufficient watering
of the works site with the active dust emitting activities;
Limitation of the
speed for vehicles on unpaved site roads;
Properly cover or
enclosure of the stockpiles and dusty materials;
Good site practices
on loading dusty materials;
Providing sufficient
vehicles washing facilities at every vehicle exit point;
Good maintenance to
the plant and equipment;
Use of quieter plant
and Quality Powered Mechanical Equipment (QPME);
Use of acoustic fabric
and noise barrier;
Using the approved Non-road
Mobile Machineries (NRMMs);
Proper storage and
handling of chemical;
Appropriate desilting,
oil interceptors or sedimentation devices provided on site for treatment before
discharge;
Onsite waste sorting and
implementation of trip ticket system;
Training of the site
personnel in proper waste management and chemical waste handling procedures;
Proper storage of the
construction materials;
Erection of
decorative screen hoarding;
Strictly following
the Environmental Permits and Licenses;
Provide sufficient
mitigation measures as recommended in Approved EIA Reports
1.5.1
A
summary of the relevant environmental licenses, permits and/or notifications on
environmental protection for this Contract is presented in Table 1.2.
Table 1.2 Relevant
Environmental Licenses, Permits and/or Notifications
|
Environmental
License / Permit / Notification |
Reference
Number |
Valid
From |
Valid
Till |
|
Environmental
Permit |
EP-337/2009 EP-339/2009/A EP-451/2013 |
23 April
2009 18 June
2009 19
September 2013 |
Not
Applicable Not
Applicable Not
Applicable |
|
Notification
pursuant to Air Pollution (Construction Dust) Regulation |
395601 |
16 November
2015 |
Not
Applicable |
|
Billing
Account for Waste Disposal |
A/C No.:
7023814 |
30 November
2015 |
Not
Applicable |
|
Construction
Noise Permit |
GW-RE1008-16 |
19 October 2016 |
09 April
2017 |
|
Construction
Noise Permit |
PP-RE0032-16 |
23 November
2016 |
15 May 2017 |
|
Wastewater
Discharge License |
WT00023125-2015 |
6 January
2016 |
31 January
2021 |
|
Chemical
Waste Producer License |
5213-247-C1232-12 |
23 November
2015 |
Not
Applicable |
2.1
Monitoring
Requirement
In accordance with
the approved EM&A Manuals, 24-hour Total Suspended Particulates (TSP) level
at the designated air quality monitoring station is required. Impact 24-hour
TSP monitoring should be carried out at least once every 6 days. In case of
complaints, 1-hour TSP monitoring should be carried out at least 3 times per 6
days when the highest dust impacts are likely to occur. The Action and Limit
Levels of the air quality monitoring are given in Appendix C.
2.2
Monitoring Equipment
The 24-hour TSP air
quality monitoring was performed using High Volume Air Samplers (HVS) located
at each of the designated monitoring station. Portable TSP Monitors would be
used in case of complaints for 1-hour TSP monitoring.
Table
2.1 summarizes
the equipment used in air quality monitoring.
Table 2.1 Air
Quality Monitoring Equipment
|
Item |
Brand |
Model |
Equipment |
Serial Number |
|
1 |
Tisch |
TE-5170
(TSP) |
High Volume
Sampler |
|
|
TE-300-310X |
- Mass Flow
Controller |
2037 |
||
|
TE-5005X |
- Blower
Motor Assembly |
3482 |
||
|
TE-5007X |
- Mechanical
Timer |
4488 |
||
|
TE-5009X |
-
Continuous Flow Recorder |
4371 |
||
|
2 |
Tisch |
TE-5170
(TSP) |
High Volume
Sampler |
|
|
TE-300-310X |
- Mass Flow
Controller |
2524 |
||
|
TE-5005X |
- Blower
Motor Assembly |
4037 |
||
|
TE-5007X |
-
Mechanical Timer |
5160 |
||
|
TE-5009X |
-
Continuous Flow Recorder |
4377 |
||
|
3 |
Tisch |
TE-5170
(TSP) |
High Volume
Sampler |
|
|
TE-300-310X |
- Mass Flow
Controller |
2618 |
||
|
TE-5005X |
- Blower
Motor Assembly |
3838 |
||
|
G3031 |
-
Mechanical Timer |
2251 |
||
|
G1051 |
-
Continuous Flow Recorder |
2307 |
||
|
4 |
Tisch |
TE-5025A |
HVS Sampler Calibrator |
0438320 / 2456 |
|
5 |
*Sibata |
Model LD-3B |
Sibata Portable TSP Monitors |
NA |
Note:
No complaint of air quality was received. Therefore,
no impact 1-hour TSP monitoring was conducted.
2.3
Monitoring
Methodology
2.3.1
24-hour TSP air quality monitoring
HVS
Installation
The
following guidelines were adopted during the installation of HVS:
n Sufficient support is
provided to secure the samplers against gusty wind.
n No two samplers are
placed less than 2 meters apart.
n The distance between
the sampler and an obstacle, such as buildings, is at least twice the height
that the obstacle protrudes above the sampler.
n A minimum of 2 meters
of separation from walls, parapets and penthouses is required for rooftop
samples.
n A minimum of 2 meters
separation from any supporting structure, measured horizontally is required.
n No furnaces or
incineration flues are nearby.
n Airflow around the
samplers is unrestricted.
n The samplers are more
than 20 meters from the drip line.
n Any wire fence and
gate, to protect the sampler, should not cause any obstruction during
monitoring.
Filters
Preparation
Fiberglass
filters (provided by the HOKLAS accredited laboratory) shall be used (Note:
these filters have a collection efficiency of larger than 99% for particles of
0.3 µm diameter). A HOKLAS accredited laboratory (ALS Technichem (HK) Pty Ltd.)
is responsible for the preparation of 24-hr conditioned and pre-weighed filter
papers for monitoring team.
All
filters are equilibrated in the conditioning environment for 24 hours before
weighing. The conditioning environment temperature is around 25¢XC and not
variable by more than ¡Ó3¢XC; the relative humidity (RH) is < 50% and not
variable by more than ¡Ó5%. A convenient working RH is 40%.
Operating / Analytical Procedures
Operating
/ analytical procedures for the air quality monitoring are highlighted as
follows:
n Prior to the
commencement of the dust sampling, the flow rate of the HVS are properly set
(between 0.6 m3/min and 1.7 m3/min) in accordance with the
EM&A manual. The flow rate shall be indicated on the flow rate chart.
n The power supply
shall be checked to ensure the samplers worked properly.
n On sampling, the
samplers shall be operated for 5 minutes to establish thermal equilibrium
before placing any filter media at the designated air quality monitoring station.
n The filter holding
frame is then removed by loosening the four nuts and carefully a weighted and
conditioned filter is centered with the stamped number upwards, on a supporting
screen.
n The filter shall be
aligned on the screen so that the gasket formed an airtight seal on the outer
edges of the filter. Then the filter holding frame is tightened to the filter
holder with swing bolts. The applied pressure should be sufficient to avoid air
leakage at the edges.
n The shelter lid shall
be closed and secured with the aluminum strip.
n The timer is then
programmed. Information shall be recorded on the record sheet, which included
the starting time, the weather condition and the filter number (the initial
weight of the filter paper can be found out by using the filter number).
n After sampling, the
filter shall be removed and sent to laboratory for weighing. The elapsed time
is also recorded.
n Before weighing, all
filters are equilibrated in a conditioning environment for 24 hours. The
conditioning environment temperature should be between 25¢XC and 30¢XC and not
vary by more than ¡Ó3¢XC; the relative humidity (RH) should be < 50% and not
vary by more than ¡Ó5%. A convenient working RH is 40%. Weighing results are
returned to MCL for further analysis of TSP concentrations collected by each
filter.
2.3.2
1-hour TSP air quality monitoring
Operating / Analytical Procedures
The measuring
procedures of the 1-hr dust meter are in accordance with the Manufacturer¡¦s
instruction Manual as follows:
¡±
Pull up
the air sampling inlet cover
¡±
Change
the Mode 0 to BG once
¡±
Push
Start/Stop switch once
¡±
Turn the
knob to SENSI.ADJ and press it
¡±
Push
Start/Stop switch once
¡±
Return
the knob to the position MEASURE slowly
¡±
Push the
timer set switch to set measuring time
¡±
Remove
the cap and make a measurement
2.4
Maintenance /
Calibration
2.4.1 24-hour TSP air quality monitoring
The
following maintenance / calibration are required for the HVS:
n The high volume
motors and their accessories are properly maintained. Appropriate maintenance
such as routine motor brushes replacement and electrical wiring checking are
made to ensure that the equipments and necessary power supply are in good
working condition.
n All HVS shall be
calibrated (five point calibration) using Calibration Kit upon installation and
thereafter in every 3 months.
n A copy of the
calibration certificates for the HVS and calibrator are provided in Appendix D.
2.4.2 1-hour TSP air quality monitoring
The
portable TSP monitor should be calibrated at 1 year intervals
2.5.1
According
to the EM&A Manual, three air quality monitoring locations, namely KTD1,
KTD2 and KER1, are covered by this Contract within the South Apron Area of
Former Kai Tak Airport. The other two air quality monitoring locations, which
are identified in Cha Kwo Ling area, are farther than 500m away from the site
boundary and thus not covered by this Contract. The monitoring works in Cha Kwo
Ling area are covered by other Contract(s) respectively.
2.5.2
According
to the approved alternative baseline air quality and noise monitoring locations
(EPD reference: EP2/K19/A/21 Pt.5), the original monitoring locations (KTD1,
KTD2 and KER1) are proposed to be replaced by alternative monitoring locations
(KTD1a, KTD2a and KER1b) for air quality monitoring, they are summarized in Table 2.2 and shown in Figure 2.
Table 2.2 Location
of Air Quality Monitoring Station
|
Monitoring
Station |
Location |
|
KTD1a |
Centre of Excellence in Paediatrics (Children¡¦s
Hospital) |
|
KTD2a |
G/IC Zone next to Kwun Tong Bypass (Future Hospital at
Site 3C1) |
|
KER1b |
Site Boundary at Cheung Yip Street |
2.6.1 The schedule of air quality monitoring in reporting month is provided in Appendix
E.
2.6.2 No Action / Limit Level exceedance was
recorded for 24-hr TSP at KTD1a, KTD2a and KER1b in the reporting month.
2.6.3 No complaint of air quality was received. Therefore, no impact 1-hour TSP
monitoring was conducted in the reporting month.
2.6.4 During the reporting month, major dust sources including loading and
unloading of C&D wastes, vehicles movement were observed in the site. Non-project
related construction activities at the nearby construction site and road
traffic along Shing Cheong Road, Cheung Yip Street and the Kwun Tong By-pass
were observed. The above factors may affect the monitoring results.
2.6.5 The weather conditions during the monitoring are provided in Appendix K.
2.6.6 The monitoring data of 24-hr TSP are summarized in Table 2.3. Detailed
monitoring data are presented in Appendix F.
Table 2.3 Summary
of 24-hr TSP Monitoring Results
|
Parameter |
Monitoring
Station |
Average
(µg/m3) |
Range
(µg/ m3) |
Action
Level (µg/ m3) |
Limit
Level (µg/ m3) |
|
24-hr TSP in µg/m3 |
KTD1a |
75 |
44 ¡V 110 |
177 |
260 |
|
KTD2a |
58 |
34 ¡V 87 |
157 |
||
|
KER1b |
86 |
58 ¡V 132 |
172 |
2.6.7 The Event and Action Plan for air quality is given in Appendix H.
2.7
Comparison of 24-hr TSP Monitoring Results with EIA
Predictions
2.7.1 The monitoring data of 24-hr TSP was compared with the EIA predictions as
summarized in Table 2.4.
Table 2.4 Comparison
of 24-hr TSP data with EIA predictions
|
Monitoring Station |
Receiver Reference |
Predicted Maximum
24-hour TSP Concentration (µg/m3) |
24-hour TSP
concentration in February 2017 (µg/m3) |
Average 24-hour TSP
concentration in February 2017 (µg/m3) |
|
KTD1a |
KTD3 |
126 |
44
¡V 110 |
75 |
|
KTD2a |
- |
- |
34
¡V 87 |
58 |
|
KER1b |
KTD6 |
169 |
58
¡V 132 |
86 |
Note:
For KTD2a, there was no receiver
reference in the EIA report, EIAR-174/2013.
Predicted Maximum TSP Concentration
extracted from Table 4.14 of EIA Report, EIAR-174/2013.
3.1
Monitoring
Requirement
In accordance with
the approved EM&A Manuals, Leq (30min) monitoring is conducted for at least
once a week during the construction phase between 0700 and 1900 on normal
weekdays at the designated monitoring locations.
3.2
Monitoring Equipment
The sound level meter used in noise monitoring will comply
with the International Electrotechnical Commission Publication (IEC) 651:1979 (Type 1) and 804:1985 (Type 1)
specifications as referred to in the Technical Memorandum issued under the
Noise Control Ordinance (NCO).
Sound
level calibrator will be used for the on-site calibration of the meter. This
calibrator complies with the IEC Publication 942 (1988) Class 1 and ANSI S1.40
- 1984. Noise measurements were only accepted to be valid if the calibration
levels from before and after the measurement agree to within 1.0dB.
Measurements shall be recorded to the nearest
0.1dB. This noise monitors are programmed to measure A-weighted equivalent
continuous sound pressure level at 30-minute intervals between 0700 and 1900 on normal weekdays at least
once a week when construction activities are underway.
Table 3.1 summarizes the noise
monitoring equipment model being used for this project.
Table 3.1 Noise
Monitoring Equipment
|
Item |
Brand |
Model |
Equipment |
Serial Number |
|
1 |
Casella |
CEL-63X Series |
Integrating Sound Level Meter |
2451083 |
|
2 |
Casella |
CEL-63X Series |
Integrating Sound Level Meter |
2451028 |
|
3 |
Casella |
CEL-633A Series |
Integrating Sound Level Meter |
3756072 |
|
4 |
Casella |
CEL-120/1 |
Calibrator |
5230950 |
|
5 |
Casella |
CEL-120/1 |
Calibrator |
4358251 |
|
6 |
Casella |
CEL-120/1 |
Calibrator |
3321858 |
|
7 |
Smart Sensor |
AR816+ |
Wind Speed Anemometer |
MC-A-001 |
3.3
Monitoring Parameters
and Frequency
Table 3.2 presents the noise monitoring parameters and frequencies.
Table 3.2 Monitoring
Parameters and Frequencies of Noise Monitoring
|
Parameter |
Frequency
and Period |
|
LAeq (30min) L10 and L90 will be recorded for reference |
At
each station at 0700-1900 hours on normal weekdays at a frequency of once a
week |
3.4
Monitoring
Methodology
The
monitoring procedures are as follows:
n The monitoring
station is set at a point 1m from the exterior of the sensitive receivers
building façade and set at a position 1.2m above the ground.
n The battery condition
is checked to ensure good functioning of the meter.
n Parameters such as
frequency weighting, the time weighting and the measurement time are set as
follows:
n frequency weighting :
A
n time weighting : Fast
n measurement time : Weekly
30 minutes between 0700-1900 on normal weekdays
n Prior to and after
noise measurement, the meter shall be calibrated using the calibrator for 94.0
dB at 1000 Hz. If the difference in the calibration level before and after measurement
is more than 1.0 dB, the measurement will be considered invalid and repeat of
noise measurement is required after re-calibration or repair of the equipment.
n Noise monitoring
should be cancelled in the presence of fog, rain, and wind with a steady speed
exceeding 5 m/s, or wind with gusts exceeding 10 m/s.
n Noise measurement
should be paused during periods of high intrusive noise if possible and
observation shall be recorded when intrusive noise is not avoided.
n At the end of the
monitoring period, the Leq, L10 and L90 are recorded. In addition, site
conditions and noise sources are recorded on a standard record sheet.
3.5
Maintenance /
Calibration
Maintenance
and Calibration procedures are as follows:
n The microphone head
of the sound level meter and calibrator should be cleaned with a soft cloth at
quarterly intervals.
n The sound level meter and calibrator should be calibrated annually by a
HOKLAS laboratory.
n Relevant calibration certificates are provided in Appendix D.
3.6.1
According
to the EM&A Manual, three noise monitoring locations, namely KTD1, KTD2 and
KER1, are covered by this Contract within the South Apron Area of Former Kai
Tak Airport. The other two noise quality monitoring locations, which are
identified in Cha Kwo Ling area, are farther than 300m away from the site
boundary and thus not covered by this Contract. The monitoring works in Cha Kwo
Ling area are covered by other Contract(s) respectively.
3.6.2
According
to the approved alternative baseline air quality and noise monitoring locations
(EPD reference: EP2/K19/A/21 Pt.5), the original monitoring locations (KTD1,
KTD2 and KER1) are proposed to be replaced by alternative monitoring locations
(KTD1a, KTD2a and KER1b) for noise monitoring, they are summarized in Table 3.3 and shown in Figure 2.
Table 3.3 Location
of Noise Monitoring Station
|
Monitoring
Station |
Location |
|
KTD1a |
Centre of Excellence in Paediatrics (Children¡¦s
Hospital) |
|
KTD2a |
G/IC Zone next to Kwun Tong Bypass (Future Hospital at
Site 3C1) |
|
KER1b |
Site Boundary at Cheung Yip Street |
3.7.1 The schedule of noise monitoring in reporting month is provided in Appendix
E.
3.7.2 During the monitoring month, at KTD1a, non-project related construction
activities at the nearby construction site and road traffic along Shing Cheong
Road were observed in the surroundings. At KTD2a, road traffic along the Kwun
Tong By-pass was observed. At KER1b, road traffic along Cheung Yip Street was
observed. Major noise sources including noise emission from plant & PME and
some other construction activities, travel of vehicles, loading and unloading
of C&D waste were observed in the site. The above factors
may affect the monitoring results.
3.7.3 No raining and wind with speed over 5 m/s was observed during noise
monitoring according to the onsite observation. The weather conditions during
the monitoring month are provided in Appendix K.
3.7.4 The noise monitoring data are summarized in Table 3.4. Detailed
monitoring data are presented in Appendix G.
Table 3.4 Summary of
Noise Impact Monitoring Results
|
Time Period |
Leq
(30min) dB(A) (Range) |
Action
Level |
Limit
Level |
||
|
Noise Monitoring
Stations |
|||||
|
KTD1a |
KTD2a |
KER1b |
|||
|
0700-1900
hrs on normal weekdays |
67 - 72 |
60 - 66 |
65 - 73 |
When one documented
complaint is received |
75 dB(A) |
Note:
KTD1a: Façade Measurement
KTD2a & KER1b: Free-field
measurement (+3dB(A) correction has been applied)
3.7.5 No Action / Limit Level exceedance was recorded for construction noise in
the reporting month.
3.7.6 The Action and Limit Levels for noise impact monitoring have been set are
presented in Appendix C.
3.7.7 The Event and Action Plan for noise is given in Appendix H.
3.8
Comparison of Noise Monitoring Results with EIA Predictions
3.8.1 The noise monitoring data was compared with the EIA predictions as
summarized in Table 3.5.
Table 3.5 Comparison
of Noise Monitoring data with EIA predictions
|
Monitoring
Station |
Receiver
Reference |
Maximum
Predicted Mitigated Construction Noise Level, dB(A) |
Leq
(30min) dB(A) in February 2017 |
|
KTD1a |
KTD1 |
74 |
67 - 72 |
|
KTD2a |
KTD2 |
75 |
60 - 66 |
|
KER1b |
KER1 |
75 |
65 - 73 |
Note:
Maximum Predicted Mitigated Construction
Noise Level extracted from Table 5.13 of EIA Report, EIAR-174/2013.
4.1.1
As per the Trunk
Road T2 EM&A Manual, the landscape and visual mitigation measures during
the construction phase shall be audited by a Registered Landscape Architect, as
a member of the Environmental Team, at least once every two weeks to ensure
compliance with the intended aims of the measures.
4.1.2
According to the Kai
Tak Development EM&A Manual, measures to mitigate landscape and visual
impacts during construction should be checked to ensure compliance with the
intended aims of the measures. The progress of the engineering works shall be
regularly reviewed onsite to identify the earliest practical opportunities for
the landscape works to be undertaken. The ET shall report on the Contractor¡¦s
compliance on a weekly basis.
4.2.1
To monitor and audit
the implementation of landscape and visual mitigation measures, four weekly
Landscape and Visual Site audits were carried out on 2, 9, 15 and 23 February 2017
and two of them, 2 and 15 February 2017 were carried out by a Registered
Landscape Architect. The weekly Landscape and Visual Impact reports were
counter-signed by IEC as according to the requirement of EM&A Manual (AEIAR-130/2009).
4.2.2
During the Site
audit on 9 February 2017, it is observed that open stockpiles at Zone 4 were
not fully covered by impervious sheeting. The item was rectified by the
Contractor and inspected on 15 February 2017.
4.2.3
During the Site
audit on 23 February 2017, it is observed that open stockpiles at Zone 1 were
not fully covered by impervious sheeting. The item was rectified by the
Contractor and inspected on 2 March 2017.
4.2.4
Should
non-compliance of the landscape and visual impact occur, action in accordance
to the event action plan presented in Appendix
H shall be carried out.
5.1.1
The
effective management of waste arising during the construction phase will be
monitored through the site audit programme. Regular audits and site inspections
should be carried out to ensure that the recommended good site practices and
other mitigation measures are implemented by the Contractor.
5.1.2
The
audit should look at all aspects of on-site waste management practices
including the waste generation, storage, recycling, transport and disposal. The
aims of waste audit are:
l to ensure the waste
arising from the works are handled, stored, collected, transferred and disposed
of in an environmentally acceptable manner;
l verify the
implementation status and evaluate the effectiveness of the mitigation
measures; and
l to encourage the
reuse and recycling of material.
5.2.1
C&D
materials and wastes sorting were carried out on site. Receptacles were
available for C&D wastes and general refuse collection.
5.2.2 The amount of wastes
generated by the site activities in the reporting month is shown in Appendix I.
5.2.3
The
Contractor is advised to properly maintain on site C&D materials and wastes
collection, sorting and recording system and maximize reuse / recycle of
C&D materials and wastes. The Contractor is reminded to properly maintain
the site tidiness and dispose of the wastes accumulated on site regularly and
properly.
5.2.4
The
Contractor is reminded that chemical waste containers should be properly
treated and stored temporarily in designated chemical waste storage area on
site in accordance with the Code of Practice on the Packaging, Labelling and
Storage of Chemical Wastes.
6.1.1
Site
inspections were carried out weekly to monitor the implementation of proper
environmental pollution control and mitigation measures for the Project. A
summary of the mitigation measures implementation schedule is provided in Appendix J.
6.1.2
In
the reporting month, four site inspections were carried out on 2, 9 15 and 23 February 2017. Two of them, held on
2 and 15 February 2017
were the
joint inspections with the IEC, ER, the Contractor and the ET.
6.1.3
No
outstanding issues were reported during the reporting month. Details of
observations recorded during the site inspections are summarized in Appendix M.
6.1.4
All
the follow-up actions requested by Contractor¡¦s ET and IEC during the site
inspections were undertaken as reported by the Contractor and confirmed in the
following weekly site inspection conducted during the reporting month.
7.1.1
No Action / Limit
Level exceedance was recorded for 24-hr TSP and construction noise at KTD1a,
KTD2a
and KER1b in the reporting
month.
7.2.1
A complaint received on 9 February 2017 was referred from EPD on 21
February 2017 and summarized as below:
�O No car washing
machine was found in the construction site near the gate of former Radar Tower
(hereinafter referred to as ¡§the Site¡¨).
�O Dust
was observed when the vehicle leaving and entering the Site.
The notification of
complaint was received by ET on 22 February 2017.
7.2.2
Cumulative complaint log, summaries of complaints, notification of
summons and successful prosecutions are presented in Appendix L.
8.1.1
The
Contractor has implemented environmental mitigation measures and requirements
as stated in the EIA Reports, the EP and the EM&A Manuals. The
implementation status of the mitigation measures during the reporting month is
summarized in Appendix J. Status of
required submission under the EP during the reporting period is summarized in Table 8.1.
Table
8.1 Status
of Required Submission under Environmental Permit
|
EP
Condition |
Submission |
Submission
Date |
|
EP-337/2009 |
||
|
Condition 2.3 |
Management Organization of Main Construction Companies |
18/12/2015 |
|
Condition 2.4 |
Design Drawing of the Project |
18/12/2015 |
|
Condition 2.11 |
Landscape Mitigation Plan(s) |
18/12/2015 |
|
Condition 3.3 |
Monthly
EM&A Report (January 2017) |
17/02/2017 |
|
EP-339/2009/A |
||
|
Condition 2.4 |
Management Organization of Main Construction Companies |
18/12/2015 |
|
Condition 2.5 |
Design Drawing of the Project |
18/12/2015 |
|
Condition 3.3 |
Monthly
EM&A Report (January 2017) |
17/02/2017 |
|
EP-451/2013 |
||
|
Condition 2.3 |
Management Organization of Main Construction Companies |
18/12/2015 |
|
Condition 2.4 |
Design Drawing of the Project |
18/12/2015 |
|
Condition 2.5 |
Landscape Mitigation Plan(s) |
18/12/2015 |
|
Condition 2.10 |
Supplementary Contamination Assessment Report |
18/12/2015 |
|
Condition 3.3 |
Baseline Monitoring Report |
12/02/2016 |
|
Condition 3.4 |
Monthly
EM&A Report (January 2017) |
17/02/2017 |
Temporary utility diversion;
Implementation of
Temporary Traffic Arragement (TTA);
Construction of
Socket H piles;
Construction of
Tunnel structure;
Construction of guide
walls and D-walls; and
Construction of
District Cooling System Works.
9.2.1
Potential
environmental impacts arising from the above construction activities are mainly
associated with construction dust, construction noise, water quality, waste
management and landscape and visual impact.
9.3.1
The
tentative schedules for environmental monitoring in the coming three months are
provided in Appendix E.
10.1.1 24-hour TSP impact
monitoring and construction noise monitoring were carried out in the reporting
month, no Action / Limit Level exceedance was recorded during the period.
10.1.2 No complaint of air quality was received. Therefore, no impact 1-hour TSP
monitoring was conducted in the reporting month.
10.1.3
Four
environmental site inspections were carried out in February 2017.
Recommendations on mitigation measures on air quality, water quality, noise,
waste management and landscape and visual impact were given to the Contractor for
remediating the deficiencies identified during the site inspections.
10.1.4
Four weekly
Landscape and Visual Site audits were carried out on 2, 9 15 and 23 February
2017 and two of them, 2 and 15 February 2017 were carried out by a Registered
Landscape Architect in the reporting month. The weekly Landscape and Visual
Impact reports were counter-signed by IEC as according to the requirement of
EM&A Manual (AEIAR-130/2009).
10.1.5
Referring to the
Contractor¡¦s information, A complaint received on
9 February 2017 was referred from EPD on 21 February 2017 and summarized as
below:
�O No
car washing machine was found in the construction site near the gate of former
Radar Tower (hereinafter referred to as ¡§the
Site¡¨).
�O Dust
was observed when the vehicle leaving and entering the Site.
The
notification of complaint was received by ET on 22 February 2017.
10.1.6 Referring to the Contractor¡¦s information, no environmental complaint,
notification of summons and successful prosecution was received in
the reporting month.
10.2
Comment and Recommendations
10.2.1
The recommended environmental mitigation
measures, as proposed in the EIA reports and EM&A Manuals shall be
effectively implemented to minimize the potential environmental impacts from
the Project. The EM&A programme would effectively monitor the environmental
impacts generated from the construction activities and ensure the proper
implementation of mitigation measures.
10.2.2
According to the environmental audit
performed in the reporting month, the following recommendations were made:
Air Quality Impact
l Open stockpile shall
be covered with impermeable sheeting to prevent dust emission.
Construction Noise Impact
l No
specific observation was identified in the reporting month.
Water Quality Impact
l Channel between Zone 1 and the Wetsep was blocked by silt or clay.
Blockage should be cleared before the wet season Waste water shall be removed.
l Surface runoff shall be prevented to enter public drainage or haul road.
Chemical and Waste Management
l No
specific observation was identified in the reporting month.
Landscape and Visual Impact
l Open
stockpiles shall be covered by unobtrusive sheeting to prevent dust and dirt
spreading to adjacent landscape areas and vegetation, and to create a neat and
tidy visual appearance.
General Condition
l Proper wheel washing
facilities in every vehicle exit point shall be provided or otherwise to ensure
no vehicle would exit.
Permit / Licenses
l No
specific observation was identified in the reporting month.
Project General Layout
Figure
2
Air and
Noise Monitoring Locations
Appendix
A
Construction
Programme
Appendix
B
Project
Organization Chart

Appendix
C
Action
and Limit Levels for Air Quality and Noise
Action
and Limit Levels for 24-hr TSP and 1-hr TSP
|
Parameter |
Monitoring
Station |
Action
Level (µg/m3) |
Limit
Level (µg/
m3) |
|
24-hr
TSP (µg/m3) |
KTD1a |
177 |
260 |
|
KTD2a |
157 |
||
|
KER1b |
172 |
||
|
*1-hr
TSP (µg/m3) |
KTD1a |
285 |
500 |
|
KTD2a |
279 |
||
|
KER1b |
295 |
Note:
1-hr
TSP monitoring should be required in case of complaints.
Action and Limit Levels for Construction Noise, Leq (30min), dB(A)
Time Period
|
Location
|
Action
|
Limit
|
0700-1900 hrs on normal
weekdays |
KTD1a KTD2a KER1b |
When one documented
complaint is received |
75 dB(A) |
Appendix
D
Calibration
Certificates of Monitoring Equipment
Appendix
E
Environmental
Monitoring Schedule
Appendix
F
Air
Quality Monitoring Data
Appendix
G
Noise
Monitoring Data
Appendix H
Events
and Action Plan
EVENT
|
ACTION
|
|||
ET
|
IEC
|
ER
|
Contractor
|
|
Action Level
|
||||
Exceedance for one sample.
|
1. Identify sources, investigate the causes of complaint and propose
remedial measures.
2. Inform IEC and ER.
3. Repeat measurement to
confirm finding;.
4. Increase monitoring frequency
|
1. Check monitoring data submitted by the ET.
2. Check the Contractor¡¦s working methods.
|
1. Notify the
Contractor.
|
1. Rectify any unacceptable practices.
2. Amend working methods agreed with the ER as appropriate.
|
Exceedance for two or more consecutive
samples.
|
1.
Identify
sources. 2.
Inform
the IEC and ER. 3.
Advise
the ER on the effectiveness of the proposed remedial measures; 4.
Repeat
measurements to confirm findings. 5.
Increase
monitoring frequency to daily. 6.
Discuss
with the IEC, ER and Contractor on remedial action required. 7.
If
exceedance continues, arrange meeting with the IEC, Contractor and ER. 8.
If exceedance stops, cease additional monitoring. |
1. Check monitoring data submitted by the ET.
2. Check the Contractor¡¦s working methods.
3. Discuss with the ET, ER and Contractor on possible remedial measures
if required.
4. Advise the ER on the effectiveness of proposed remedial measures if
required.
|
1. Notify the Contractor.
2. Ensure remedial measures properly implemented.
|
1. Submit proposals for remedial action to the ER within 3 working days
of notification.
2. Implement the agreed proposals.
3. Amend proposal as appropriate
|
Limit Level
|
||||
Exceedance for one sample.
|
1. Identify sources, investigate causes of exceedance and proposed
remedial measures.
2. Inform the IEC, ER, and Contractor.
3. Repeat measurement to confirm finding.
4. 4. Increase monitoring
frequency to daily.
5. Assess effectiveness of the Contractor¡¦s remedial action and keep the
IEC and ER informed of the results
|
1. Check monitoring data submitted by the ET.
2. Check the Contractor¡¦s working methods.
3. Discuss with the ET, ER and Contractor on possible remedial measures.
4. Advise the ER and ET on the effectiveness of the proposed remedial
measures.
5. Supervise the implementation of remedial measures.
|
1. Confirm receipt of the notification of exceedance in writing.
2. Notify the Contractor.
3. Ensure remedial measures are properly implemented.
|
1. Take immediate action to avoid further exceedance.
2. Submit proposals for remedial action to the ER and copy to the ET and
IEC within 3 working days of notification.
3. Implement the agreed proposals.
4. Amend proposal as appropriate.
|
Exceedance for two or more consecutive
samples
|
1. Notify the IEC, ER and Contractor.
2. Identify sources.
3. Repeat measurements to confirm findings.
4. Increase monitoring frequency to daily.
5. Carry out analysis of the Contractor¡¦s working procedures with the ER
to determine the possible mitigation to be implemented.
6. Arrange meeting with the IEC and ER to discuss the remedial action to
be taken.
7. Assess the effectiveness of the Contractor¡¦s remedial action and keep
the IEC, EPD and ER informed of the results.
8. If exceedance stops, cease additional monitoring
|
1. Discuss amongst the ER, ET and Contractor on the potential remedial
action.
2. Review the Contractor¡¦s remedial action whenever necessary to assure
their effectiveness and advise the ER and ET accordingly.
3. Supervise the implementation of remedial measures.
|
1. Confirm receipt of the notification of exceedance in writing.
2. Notify the Contractor.
3. In consultation with the IEC and ET, agree with the Contractor on the
remedial measures to be implemented.
4. Ensure remedial measures are properly implemented.
5. If exceedance continues, consider what portion of works is
responsible and instruct the Contractor to stop that portion of works until
the exceedance is abated.
|
1. Take immediate action to avoid further exceedance.
2. Submit proposals for remedial action to the ER and copy to the IEC
and ET within 3 working days of notification.
3. Implement the agreed proposals.
4. Resubmit proposals if problems still not under control.
5. Stop the relevant portion of works as determined by the ER until the
exceedance is abated.
|
Event and Action Plan for Noise Impact
EVENT
|
ACTION
|
|||
ET
|
IEC
|
ER
|
Contractor
|
|
Action Level
|
1.
Notify
the IEC, ER and Contractor. 2.
Carry
out investigation. 3.
Report
the results of investigation to the IEC and Contractor. 4.
Discuss
jointly with the ER and Contractor and formulate remedial measures. 5.
Increase
the monitoring frequency to check the mitigation effectiveness |
1. Review the
monitoring data submitted by the ET. 2. Review the
construction methods and proposed redial measures by the Contractor, and
advise the ET and ER if the proposed remedial measures would be sufficient |
1. Notify the
Contractor. 2. Require the
Contractor to propose remedial measures for implementation if required. |
1.
Submit
noise mitigation proposals to the ER and copy to the IEC and ET. 2.
Implement
noise mitigation proposals. |
Limit Level
|
1.
Notify
the IEC, ER and Contractor. 2.
Identify
sources. 3.
Repeat
measurements to confirm findings. 4.
Carry
out analysis of the Contractor¡¦s working procedures with the ER and
Contractor to determine possible mitigations to be implemented. 5.
Record
the causes and action taken for the exceedances. 6.
Increase
the monitoring frequency. 7.
Assess
the effectiveness of the Contractor¡¦s remedial action with the ER and keep
the IEC informed of the results. 8.
If exceedance stops, cease additional monitoring |
1.
Discuss
amongst the ER, ET and Contractor on the potential remedial action. 2.
Review
the Contractor¡¦s remedial action whenever necessary to assure their
effectiveness and advise the ER accordingly. 3.
Supervise the implementation of remedial measures. |
1.
Confirm
receipt of notification of exceedance in writing. 2.
Notify
the Contractor. 3.
Require
the Contractor to propose remedial measures for the analysed noise problems. 4.
Ensure
remedial measures are properly implemented. 5.
If exceedance continues, consider what portion of work
is responsible and instruct the Contractor to stop that portion of works
until the exceedance is abated. |
1.
Take
immediate action to avoid further exceedance. 2.
Submit
proposals for remedial action to the ER and copy to the ET and IEC within 3
working days of notification. 3.
Implement
the agreed proposals. 4.
Resubmit
proposals if problems still not under control. 5.
Stop the relevant portion of works as determined by the
ER until the exceedance is abated. |
Event
and Action Plan for Landscape and Visual Impact
EVENT
|
ACTION
|
|||
ET
|
IEC
|
ER
|
Contractor
|
|
Non-conformity on one occasion
|
1.
Identify
Source 2.
Inform
the IEC and the ER 3.
Discuss
remedial actions with the IEC, the ER and the Contractor 4.
Monitor
remedial actions until rectification has been completed |
1.
Check
report 2.
Check
the Contractor's working method 3.
Discuss
with the ET and the Contractor on possible remedial measures 4.
Advise
the ER on effectiveness of proposed remedial measures. 5.
Check
implementation of remedial measures. |
1.
Notify
Contractor 2.
Ensure
remedial measures are properly implemented |
1.
Amend
working methods 2.
Rectify
damage and undertake any necessary replacement |
Repeated Non-conformity
|
1.
Identify
Source 2.
Inform
the IEC and the ER 3.
Increase
monitoring frequency 4.
Discuss
remedial actions with the IEC, the ER and the Contractor 5.
Monitor
remedial actions until rectification has been completed 6.
If
exceedance stops, cease additional monitoring |
1.
Check
monitoring report 2.
Check
the Contractor's working method 3.
Discuss
with the ET and the Contractor on possible remedial measures 4.
Advise
the ER on effectiveness of proposed remedial measures 5.
Supervise
implementation of remedial measures. |
1.
Notify
the Contractor 2.
Ensure
remedial measures are properly implemented |
1.
Amend
working methods 2.
Rectify
damage and undertake any necessary replacement |
Appendix
I
Waste
Flow Table
|
Waste Flow Table for
Year 2016 |
|||||||||||
|
Monthly Ending |
Actual Quantities of Inert C&D
Materials Generated Monthly |
Actual Quantities of Non-inert
C&D Wastes Generated Monthly |
|||||||||
|
Total Quantity Generated (Inert
C&D) |
Hard Rock and Large Broken Concrete |
Reused in the Contract |
Reused in other Projects |
Disposed as Public Fill |
Imported Fill |
Metals |
Paper/ cardboard packaging |
Plastics |
Chemical Waste |
Others, e.g. general refuse |
|
|
(in '000m3) |
(in '000m3) |
(in '000m3) |
(in '000m3) |
(in '000m3) |
(in '000m3) |
(in '000 kg) |
(in '000kg) |
(in '000kg) |
(in '000kg) |
(in '000m3) |
|
|
2016 Jan |
0.159 |
0.101 |
0.058 |
Nil |
Nil |
Nil |
Nil |
0.023 |
0.00002 |
0.0158 |
0.0335 |
|
2016 Feb |
0.291 |
0.050 |
0.241 |
Nil |
Nil |
Nil |
1.34 |
0.023 |
0.00002 |
0.0158 |
0.0335 |
|
2016 Mar |
2.7389 |
0.0407 |
0.0662 |
Nil |
2.632 |
Nil |
5.92 |
0.023 |
0.00002 |
0.0158 |
0.0571 |
|
2016 Apr |
4.1718 |
0.0578 |
0.462 |
Nil |
3.652 |
Nil |
12.5 |
0.023 |
0.00002 |
0.0158 |
0.0426 |
|
2016 May |
3.592 |
Nil |
0.299 |
Nil |
3.293 |
Nil |
5.23 |
0.023 |
0.00002 |
0.0158 |
0.0621 |
|
2016 June |
4.6035 |
Nil |
0.8555 |
Nil |
3.748 |
Nil |
Nil |
0.023 |
0.00002 |
0.0158 |
0.0619 |
|
2016 July |
6.155 |
0.153 |
0.015 |
Nil |
5.987 |
Nil |
7.84 |
0.023 |
0.00002 |
0.0158 |
0.0433 |
|
2016 Aug |
5.1155 |
Nil |
Nil |
Nil |
5.1155 |
Nil |
19.93 |
0.023 |
Nil |
Nil |
0.0147 |
|
2016 Sept |
7.2267 |
Nil |
Nil |
Nil |
7.2267 |
Nil |
33.65 |
0.023 |
Nil |
Nil |
0.0103 |
|
2016 Oct |
4.6448 |
Nil |
Nil |
Nil |
4.6448 |
Nil |
13.30 |
0.023 |
Nil |
Nil |
0.0385 |
|
2016 Nov |
6.1626 |
Nil |
Nil |
Nil |
6.1626 |
Nil |
27.06 |
0.023 |
Nil |
Nil |
0.0192 |
|
2016 Dec |
6.3522 |
Nil |
Nil |
Nil |
6.3522 |
Nil |
13.30 |
0.023 |
Nil |
Nil |
0.0121 |
|
Total |
51.213 |
0.4025 |
1.9967 |
Nil |
48.8138 |
Nil |
140.07 |
0.276 |
0.00014 |
0.1106 |
0.4288 |
Note:
1) The waste flow table
shall also include C&D materials that are specified in the Contract to be
imported for use at the Site.
2) Plastics refer to
plastic bottles/containers, plastic sheets/foam from packaging materials.
Note:
1) The waste flow table
shall also include C&D materials that are specified in the Contract to be
imported for use at the Site.
2) Plastics refer to
plastic bottles/containers, plastic sheets/foam from packaging materials.
|
Waste Flow Table for
Year 2017 |
|||||||||||
|
Monthly Ending |
Actual Quantities of Inert C&D
Materials Generated Monthly |
Actual Quantities of Non-inert
C&D Wastes Generated Monthly |
|||||||||
|
Total Quantity Generated (Inert
C&D) |
Hard Rock and Large Broken Concrete |
Reused in the Contract |
Reused in other Projects |
Disposed as Public Fill |
Imported Fill |
Metals |
Paper/ cardboard packaging |
Plastics |
Chemical Waste |
Others, e.g. general refuse |
|
|
(in '000m3) |
(in '000m3) |
(in '000m3) |
(in '000m3) |
(in '000m3) |
(in '000m3) |
(in '000 kg) |
(in '000kg) |
(in '000kg) |
(in '000kg) |
(in '000m3) |
|
|
2017 Jan |
4.2300 |
Nil |
Nil |
Nil |
4.2300 |
Nil |
0.015 |
0.023 |
Nil |
Nil |
0.0109 |
|
2017 Feb |
3.2128 |
Nil |
Nil |
Nil |
3.2128 |
Nil |
0.015 |
0.023 |
Nil |
Nil |
0.0096 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
7.4428 |
Nil |
Nil |
Nil |
7.4428 |
Nil |
0.030 |
0.046 |
Nil |
Nil |
0.0205 |
Appendix
J
Environmental
Mitigation Implementation Schedule (EMIS)
|
EIA Ref |
EM&A
Ref |
Environmental
Protection Measures / Mitigation Measures |
Who
to implement the measure |
Location
/ Timing |
Construction
Phase Implementation
Status |
|
Air Quality Measures |
|||||
|
New Distributor
Roads Serving the Planned KTD |
|||||
|
AEIAR-130/2009
S3.2 |
AEIAR 130/2009 EM&A Manual S2.2 |
8 times daily
watering of the work site with active dust emitting activities. |
Contractor |
All relevant worksites |
Implemented |
|
Decommissioning of
the Radar Station of the former Kai Tak Airport |
|||||
|
AEIAR-130/2009
S5.2.19 |
AEIAR 130/2009 EM&A Manual S4.2.4 |
The excavation area
should be limited to as small in size as possible and backfilled with clean
and/or treated soil shortly after excavation work. The exposed excavated area should be
covered by the tarpaulin during night time. The top layer soils should be sprayed
with fine misting of water immediately before the excavation. |
Contractor |
All relevant worksites |
Not Applicable |
|
Trunk Road T2 |
|||||
|
AEIAR-174/2013
S4.9.2.1 |
AEIAR-174/2013 EM&A Manual S2.3.1.1 |
Watering of the
construction areas 12 times per day to reduce dust emissions by 91.7%, with
reference to the ¡§Control of Open Fugitive Dust Sources¡¨ (USEPA AP-42). The
amount of water to be applied would be 0.91L/m2 for the respective watering
frequency. |
Contractor |
All relevant worksites |
Implemented |
|
Dust enclosures with
watering would be provided along the loading ramps and conveyor belts for
unloading the C&D materials to the barge for dust suppression. |
Contractor |
All
relevant worksites |
Not Applicable |
||
|
8 km per hour is the
recommended limit of the speed for vehicles on unpaved site roads. |
Contractor |
All
relevant worksites |
Implemented |
||
|
|
|
Good Site Practices |
|
|
|
|
AEIAR-130/2009
S3.2, S5.2.19, AEIAR-174/2013 S4.9.2.2 |
AEIAR 130/2009 EM&A Manual S2.2, S4.2,
AEIAR-174/2013 EM&A Manual S2.3.1.2 |
Stockpiling site(s)
should be lined with impermeable sheeting and bunded. Stockpiles should be
fully covered by impermeable sheeting to reduce dust emission. |
Contractor |
All
relevant worksites |
Partially Implemented |
|
Use of regular
watering to reduce dust emissions from exposed site surfaces and unpaved
roads, particularly during dry weather. Use of frequent watering for
particularly dusty construction areas and areas close to ASRs. |
Contractor |
All
relevant worksites |
Implemented |
||
|
Misting for the
dusty material should be carried out before being loaded into the vehicle.
Any vehicle with an open load carrying area should have properly fitted side
and tail boards. |
Contractor |
All
relevant worksites |
Implemented |
||
|
Material having the
potential to create dust should not be loaded from a level higher than the
side and tail boards and should be dampened and covered by a clean tarpaulin. |
Contractor |
All
relevant worksites |
Implemented |
||
|
Tarpaulin covering
of all dusty vehicle loads transported to, from and between site locations;
The tarpaulin should be properly secured and should extent at least 300 mm over
the edges of the sides and tailboards. The material should also be dampened
if necessary before transportation. |
Contractor |
All
relevant worksites |
Implemented |
||
|
The vehicles should
be restricted to maximum speed of 10 km per hour. Confined haulage and delivery
vehicle to designated roadways insider the site. Onsite unpaved roads should
be compacted and kept free of lose materials. |
Contractor |
All
relevant worksites |
Implemented |
||
|
Vehicle washing
facilities should be provided at every vehicle exit point. Every vehicle
should be washed to remove any dusty materials from its body and wheels
before leaving the construction sites. The area where
vehicle washing takes place and the section of the road between the washing
facilities and the exit point should be paved with concrete, bituminous
materials or hardcores. |
Contractor |
All
relevant worksites |
Partially Implemented |
||
|
Every main haul road
should be scaled with concrete and kept clear of dusty materials or sprayed
with water so as to maintain the entire road surface wet. |
Contractor |
All
relevant worksites |
Implemented |
||
|
Every stock of more
than 20 bags of cement or dry pulverised fuel ash (PFA) should be covered
entirely by impervious sheeting or placed in an area sheltered on the top and
the 3 sides. |
Contractor |
All
relevant worksites |
Implemented |
||
|
Cement or dry PFA
delivered in bulk should be stored in a closed silo fitted with an audible
high level alarm which is interlocked with the material filling line and no
overfilling is allowed. |
Contractor |
All
relevant worksites |
Implemented |
||
|
Loading, unloading,
transfer, handling or storage of bulk cement or dry PFA should be carried out
in a totally enclosed system or facility, and any vent or exhaust should be
fitted with an effective fabric filter or equivalent air pollution control
system. |
Contractor |
All
relevant worksites |
Implemented |
||
|
Side enclosure and
covering of any aggregate or dusty material storage piles to reduce
emissions. Where this is not practicable owing to frequent usage, watering
shall be applied to aggregate fines. |
Contractor |
All
relevant worksites |
Partially Implemented |
||
|
Open stockpiles
shall be avoided or covered. Prevent placing dusty material storage piles
near ASRs. |
Contractor |
All
relevant worksites |
Partially Implemented |
||
|
Routing of vehicles
and position of construction plant should be at the maximum possible distance
from ASRs. |
Contractor |
All
relevant worksites |
Not Applicable |
||
|
Dark smoke |
|
|
|
||
|
Dark smoke emission
shall be control in accordance with the Air Pollution Control (Smoke) Regulation
and ETWB TCW 19/2005. |
Contractor |
All
relevant worksites |
Partially
Implemented |
||
|
Plant and equipment
should be well maintained to prevent dark smoke emission. |
Contractor |
All
relevant worksites |
Partially
Implemented |
||
|
Noise Measures |
|||||
|
Trunk Road T2 |
|||||
|
AEIAR-174/2013 S5.9.2.1 |
AEIAR-174/2013
EM&A Manual S3.4.1.1 |
The use of quieter plant, including Quality Powered
Mechanical Equipment (QPME) is specified for the list of equipment: |
Contractor |
All
relevant worksites |
Implemented |
|
Use of temporary or fixed noise barriers with a surface
density of at least 10kg/m2 to screen noise from movable and
stationary plant. |
Contractor |
All
relevant worksites |
Implemented |
||
|
Use of enclosures with covers at top and three sides and a
surface density of at least 10kg/m2 to screen noise from generally
static noisy plant such as air compressors. |
Contractor |
All
relevant worksites |
Implemented |
||
|
Use of acoustic
fabric for the silent piling system, drill rigs, rock drills etc. |
Contractor |
All
relevant worksites |
Implemented |
||
|
|
|
Good Site Practices |
|
|
|
|
AEIAR-130/2009 S3.3, S5.3.10,
AEIAR-174/2013 S5.9.2.1 |
AEIAR 130/2009 EM&A Manual
S2.3, S4.3.2, AEIAR-174/2013 EM&A Manual S3.4.1.1 |
Only well-maintained plant should be operated on-site and
plant shall be serviced regularly during the construction/ decommissioning
program. |
Contractor |
All
relevant worksites |
Implemented |
|
Silencers or mufflers on construction equipment should be
utilized and shall be properly maintained during the construction/
decommissioning program. |
Contractor |
All
relevant worksites |
Implemented |
||
|
Mobile plant, if
any, should be sited as far away from NSRs as possible. |
Contractor |
All
relevant worksites |
Implemented |
||
|
Machines and plant (such as trucks) that may be in
intermittent use shall be shut down between works periods or should be
throttled down to a minimum. |
Contractor |
All
relevant worksites |
Implemented |
||
|
Plant known to emit noise strongly in one direction shall,
wherever possible, be orientated so that the noise is directed away from the
nearby NSRs. |
Contractor |
All
relevant worksites |
Implemented |
||
|
Material stockpiles and other structures should be
effectively utilized, wherever practicable, in screening noise from on-site
construction/ decommissioning activities. |
Contractor |
All
relevant worksites |
Implemented |
||
|
Use of site hoarding as a noise barrier to screen noise at
low level NSRs. |
Contractor |
All
relevant worksites |
Implemented |
||
|
For the use of hand held percussive breakers (with mass of
above 10kg) and portable air compressors (supply air at 500 kPa or above),
the noise level of such PME shall comply with a stringent noise emission
standard and a noise emission label shall be obtained from the DEP before use
at any time in construction site. |
Contractor |
All
relevant worksites |
Implemented |
||
|
Quiet powered mechanical equipment (PME) shall be used for
the construction of the Project. |
Contractor |
All
relevant worksites |
Implemented |
||
|
Full enclosures shall be used to screen noise from
relatively static PMEs (including air compressor, bar bender, concrete pump,
generator and water pump) from sensitive receiver(s). |
Contractor |
All
relevant worksites |
Implemented |
||
|
Movable cantilevered noise barriers shall be used to
screen noise from mobile PMEs (including asphalt paver, breaker, excavator
and hand-held breaker) from sensitive receiver(s). These movable cantilevered
noise barriers shall be located close to the mobile PMEs and shall be
moved/adjusted iteratively in step with each movement of the corresponding
mobile PMEs in order to maximize their noise reduction effects. |
Contractor |
All
relevant worksites |
Implemented |
||
|
Only approved or exempted Non-road Mobile Machineries
(NRMMs) including regulated machines and non-road vechicles with proper
labels are allowed to be used in specified activities on-site. |
Contractor |
All
relevant worksites |
Implemented |
||
|
Water Quality Measures |
|||||
|
Trunk Road T2 |
|||||
|
|
|
Accidental Spillage |
|
|
|
|
AEIAR-174/2013 S6.4.8.5 |
AEIAR-174/2013
EM&A Manual S4.2.1.1 |
All bentonite slurry should be stored in a container that
resistant to corrosion, maintained in good conditions and securely closed;
The container should be labelled in English and Chinese and note that the
container is for storage of bentonite slurry only. |
Contractor |
All
relevant worksites |
Implemented |
|
The storage container should be placed on an area of
impermeable flooring and bunded with capacity to accommodate 110% of the
volume of the container size or 20% by volume stored in the area and enclosed
with at least 3 sides. |
Contractor |
All
relevant worksites |
Implemented |
||
|
The storage container should be sufficiently covered to
prevent rainfall entering the container or bunded area (water collected
within the bund must be tested and disposed of as chemical waste, if
necessary). An emergency clean up kit shall be readily available where
bentonite fluid will be stored or used. |
Contractor |
All
relevant worksites |
Implemented |
||
|
The handling and disposal of bentonite slurries should be
undertaken in accordance within ProPECC PN 1/94. Surplus bentonite slurries
used in construction works shall be reconditioned and reused wherever
practicable. Residual bentonite slurry shall be disposed of from the site as
soon as possible as stipulated in Clause 8.56 of the General Specification
for Civil Engineering Works. The Contractor should explore alternative
disposal outlets for the residual bentonite slurry (dewatered bentonite
slurry to be disposed to a public filling area and liquid bentonite slurry,
if mixed with inert fill material, to be disposed to a public filling area)
and disposal at landfill should be the last resort. |
Contractor |
All
relevant worksites |
Implemented |
||
|
AEIAR-174/2013 S6.4.8.8 |
AEIAR-174/2013
EM&A Manual S4.2.1.1 |
In order to protect against impacts to the surrounding
marine waters of the KTTS and Victoria Harbour in the event of an accidental
spillage of fuel or oil, the Contractor will be required to prepare a spill
response plan to the satisfaction of AFCD, EPD, FSD, Police, TD and WSD to
define procedures for the control, containment and clean-up of any spillage
that could occur on the construction site. |
Contractor |
All relevant worksites |
Implemented |
|
|
|
Dredging,
Reclamation and Filling |
|
|
|
|
|
|
No dredging,
reclamation or filling in the marine environment shall be carried out. |
Contractor |
All relevant worksites |
Implemented |
|
Decommissioning of
the Radar Station of the former Kai Tak Airport |
|||||
|
|
|
Building Demolition |
|
|
|
|
AEIAR-130/2009 S5.4 |
AEIAR
130/2009 EM&A Manual S4.4 |
The site practices outlined in ProPECC PN 1/94
¡§Construction Site Drainage¡¨ should be followed as far as practicable in order
to minimise surface runoff and the chance of erosion. |
Contractor |
All
relevant worksites |
Implemented |
|
There is a need to apply to EPD for a discharge licence
under the WPCO for discharging effluent from the construction site. The
discharge quality is required to meet the requirements specified in the
discharge licence. All the runoff, wastewater or extracted groundwater
generated from the works areas should be treated so that it satisfies all the
standards listed in the TM-DSS. It is anticipated that the wastewater
generated from the works areas would be of small quantity. Monitoring of the
treated effluent quality from the works areas should be carried out in
accordance with the WPCO license which is under the ambit of regional office
(RO) of EPD. |
Contractor |
All
relevant worksites |
Implemented |
||
|
|
|
General Construction
Works |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction Runoff |
|
|
|
|
AEIAR-130/2009 S3.4, S5.4/ AEIAR-174/2013 S6.4.8.1 |
AEIAR
130/2009 EM&A Manual S2.4,
S4.4/ AEIAR-174/2013 EM&A Manual S4.2.1.1 |
Exposed soil areas should be minimised to reduce the
potential for increased siltation, contamination of runoff, and erosion.
Construction runoff related impacts associated with the above ground
construction activities can be readily controlled through the use of
appropriate mitigation measures which include the use of sediment traps and
adequate maintenance of drainage systems to prevent flooding and overflow. |
Contractor |
All relevant worksites |
Implemented |
|
Construction site should be provided with adequately
designed perimeter channel and pre-treatment facilities and proper
maintenance. The boundaries of critical areas of earthworks should be marked
and surrounded by dykes or embankments for flood protection. Temporary
ditches should be provided to facilitate runoff discharge into the
appropriate watercourses, via a silt retention pond. Permanent drainage
channels should incorporate sediment basins or traps and baffles to enhance
deposition rates. The design of efficient silt removal facilities should be
based on the guidelines in Appendix A1 of ProPECC PN 1/94. |
Contractor |
All
relevant worksites |
Implemented |
||
|
Ideally, construction works should be programmed to
minimise surface excavation works during the rainy season (April to
September). All exposed earth areas should be completed as soon as possible
after earthworks have been completed, or alternatively, within 14 days of the
cessation of earthworks where practicable. If excavation of soil cannot be
avoided during the rainy season, or at any time of year when rainstorms are
likely, exposed slope surfaces should be covered by tarpaulin or other means. |
Contractor |
All
relevant worksites |
Implemented |
||
|
Sediment tanks of sufficient capacity, constructed from
pre-formed individual cells of approximately 6 to 8 m3 capacity, are
recommended as a general mitigation measure which can be used for settling
surface runoff prior to disposal. The system capacity is flexible and able to
handle multiple inputs from a variety of sources and particularly suited to
applications where the influent is pumped. |
Contractor |
All
relevant worksites |
Implemented |
||
|
Open stockpiles of construction materials (for examples,
aggregates, sand and fill material) of more than 50 m3 should be
covered with tarpaulin or similar fabric during rainstorms. Measures should
be taken to prevent the washing away of construction materials, soil, silt or
debris into any drainage system. |
Contractor |
All
relevant worksites |
Partially Implemented |
||
|
Manholes (including newly constructed ones) should always
be adequately covered and temporarily sealed so as to prevent silt,
construction materials or debris being washed into the drainage system and
storm runoff being directed into foul sewers. |
Contractor |
All
relevant worksites |
Implemented |
||
|
Precautions to be taken at any time of year when rainstorms
are likely, actions to be taken when a rainstorm is imminent or forecast, and
actions to be taken during or after rainstorms are summarised in Appendix A2
of ProPECC PN 1/94. Particular attention should be paid to the control of
silty surface runoff during storm events. |
Contractor |
All
relevant worksites |
Implemented |
||
|
Oil interceptors should be provided in the drainage system
and regularly cleaned to prevent the release of oils and grease into the
storm water drainage system after accidental spillages. The interceptor
should have a bypass to prevent flushing during periods of heavy rain. |
Contractor |
All
relevant worksites |
Not Applicable |
||
|
An adequately designed and located wheel washing bay
should be provided at every site exit, and wash-water should have sand and
silt settled out and removed at least on a weekly basis to ensure the
continued efficiency of the process. The section of access road leading to,
and exiting from, the wheel-wash bay to the public road should be paved with
sufficient backfall toward the wheel-wash bay to prevent vehicle tracking of
soil and silty water to public roads and drains. |
Contractor |
All relevant worksites |
Implemented |
||
|
Drainage |
|
|
|
||
|
It is recommended that on-site drainage system should be
installed prior to the commencement of other construction activities.
Sediment traps should be installed in order to minimise the sediment loading
of the effluent prior to discharge into foul sewers. There should be no
direct discharge of effluent from the site into the sea. |
Contractor |
All
relevant worksites |
Implemented |
||
|
All temporary and permanent drainage pipes and culverts
provided to facilitate runoff discharge should be adequately designed for the
controlled release of storm flows. All sediment control measures should be
regularly inspected and maintained to ensure proper and efficient operation
at all times and particularly following rain storms. The temporarily diverted
drainage should be reinstated to its original condition when the construction
work has finished or the temporary diversion is no longer required. |
Contractor |
All
relevant worksites |
Partially Implemented |
||
|
Stormwater
Discharges |
|
|
|
||
|
Minimum distances of 100 m should be maintained between
the existing or planned stormwater discharges and the existing or planned
seawater intakes. |
Contractor |
All relevant worksites |
Not Applicable |
||
|
Sewage Effluent |
|
|
|
||
|
Construction work force sewage discharges on site are
expected to be connected to the existing trunk sewer or sewage treatment
facilities. The construction sewage may need to be handled by portable
chemical toilets prior to the commission of the on-site sewer system.
Appropriate numbers of portable toilets should be provided by a licensed
contractor to serve the large number of construction workers over the construction
site. The Contractor should also be responsible for waste disposal and
maintenance practices. |
Contractor |
All relevant worksites |
Implemented |
||
|
Debris and Litter |
|
|
|
||
|
In order to maintain water quality in acceptable
conditions with regard to aesthetic quality, contractors should be required,
under conditions of contract, to ensure that site management is optimised and
that disposal of any solid materials, litter or wastes to marine waters does
not occur. Debris and refuse generated on-site should be collected, handled
and disposed of properly to avoid entering into the adjacent harbour waters.
Stockpiles of cement and other construction materials should be kept covered
when not being used. |
Contractor |
All relevant worksites |
Implemented |
||
|
Accidental Spillage |
|
|
|
||
|
Oils and fuels should only be used and stored in
designated areas which have pollution prevention facilities. To prevent
spillage of fuels and solvents to the nearby harbour waters, all fuel tanks
and storage areas should be provided with locks and be sited on sealed areas,
within bunds of a capacity equal to 110% of the storage capacity of the
largest tank, to prevent spilled fuel oils from reaching the coastal waters
of the Victoria Harbour WCZ. The bund should be drained of rainwater after a rain
event. |
Contractor |
All relevant worksites |
Implemented |
||
|
Waste Management
Measures |
|||||
|
|
|
Waste Management
Plan |
|
|
|
|
AEIAR-174/2013 S11.4.8.1 |
AEIAR-174/2013
EM&A Manual S9.2.1.2 |
Contractor should be requested to submit an outline Waste
Management Plan (WMP) prior to the commencement of construction work, in
accordance with the ETWB TC(W) No.19/2005 so as to provide an overall
framework of waste management and reduction. |
Contractor |
All relevant worksites |
Implemented |
|
|
|
Good Site Practices |
|
|
|
|
AEIAR-130/2009 S3.5, S5.5 |
AEIAR
130/2009 EM&A Manual S2.5, S4.5 |
Nomination of an approved person, such as a site manager,
to be responsible for good site practices, arrangements for collection and
effective disposal to an appropriate facility, of all wastes generated at the
site. |
Contractor |
All
relevant worksites |
Implemented |
|
Training of site personnel in proper waste management and
chemical waste handling procedures. |
Contractor |
All
relevant worksites |
Implemented |
||
|
Provision of
sufficient waste disposal points and regular collection for disposal. |
Contractor |
All
relevant worksites |
Implemented |
||
|
Appropriate measures to minimize windblown litter and dust
during transportation of waste by either covering trucks or by transporting
wastes in enclosed containers. |
Contractor |
All
relevant worksites |
Implemented |
||
|
A recording system for the amount of wastes generated,
recycled and disposed of (including the disposal sites). |
Contractor |
All
relevant worksites |
Implemented |
||
|
Waste Reduction
Measures |
|
|
|
||
|
Sort C&D waste from demolition of the remaining
structures to recover recyclable portions such as metals. |
Contractor |
All
relevant worksites |
Not Applicable |
||
|
Segregation and storage of different types of waste in
different containers, skips or stockpiles to enhance reuse or recycling of
materials and their proper disposal. |
Contractor |
All
relevant worksites |
Implemented |
||
|
Encourage collection of aluminum cans, PET bottles and
paper by providing separate labelled bins to enable these wastes to be
segregated from other general refuse generated by the work force. |
Contractor |
All
relevant worksites |
Implemented |
||
|
Any unused chemicals
or those with remaining functional capacity should be recycled. |
Contractor |
All
relevant worksites |
Implemented |
||
|
Proper storage and site practices to minimize the
potential for damage or contamination of construction materials. |
Contractor |
All
relevant worksites |
Implemented |
||
|
Construction and
Demolition Materials |
|
|
|
||
|
Where it is unavoidable to have transient stockpiles of
C&D material within the work site pending collection for disposal, the
transient stockpiles shall be located away from waterfront or storm drains as
far as possible. |
Contractor |
All
relevant worksites |
Implemented |
||
|
Open stockpiles of construction materials or construction
wastes on-site should be covered with tarpaulin or similar fabric. |
Contractor |
All
relevant worksites |
Partially Implemented |
||
|
Skip hoist for
material transport should be totally enclosed by impervious sheeting. |
Contractor |
All
relevant worksites |
Implemented |
||
|
Every vehicle should be washed to remove any dusty
materials from its body and wheels before leaving a construction site. |
Contractor |
All
relevant worksites |
Implemented |
||
|
The area where vehicle washing takes place and the section
of the road between the washing facilities and the exit point should be paved
with concrete, bituminous materials or hardcores. |
Contractor |
All
relevant worksites |
Implemented |
||
|
The load of dusty materials carried by vehicle leaving a
construction site should be covered entirely by clean impervious sheeting to
ensure dust materials do not leak from the vehicle. |
Contractor |
All
relevant worksites |
Implemented |
||
|
All dusty materials should be sprayed with water prior to
any loading, unloading or transfer operation so as to maintain the dusty
materials wet. |
Contractor |
All
relevant worksites |
Implemented |
||
|
The height from which excavated materials are dropped
should be controlled to a minimum practical height to limit fugitive dust
generation from unloading. |
Contractor |
All
relevant worksites |
Implemented |
||
|
When delivering inert C&D material to public fill
reception facilities, the material should consist entirely of inert
construction waste and of size less than 250mm or other sizes as agreed with
the Secretary of the Public Fill Committee. In order to monitor the disposal
of the surplus C&D material at the designed public fill reception
facility and to control fly tipping, a trip-ticket system as stipulated in
the ETWB TCW No. 31/2004 ¡§Trip Ticket System for Disposal of Construction and
Demolition Materials¡¨ should be included as one of the contractual
requirements and implemented by an Environmental Team undertaking the
Environmental Monitoring and Audit work. An Independent Environmental Checker
should be responsible for auditing the results of the system. |
Contractor |
All
relevant worksites |
Implemented |
||
|
Chemical Waste |
|
|
|
||
|
After use, chemical wastes (for example, cleaning fluids,
solvents, lubrication oil and fuel) should be handled according to the Code
of Practice on the Packaging, Labelling and Storage of Chemical Wastes. Spent
chemicals should be collected by a licensed collector for disposal at the
CWTF or other licensed facility, in accordance with the Waste Disposal
(Chemical Waste) (General) Regulation. |
Contractor |
All relevant worksites |
Partially Implemented |
||
|
General Refuse |
|
|
|
||
|
General refuse should be stored in enclosed bins or
compaction units separate from C&D material. A licensed waste collector
should be employed by the contractor to remove general refuse from the site,
separately from C&D material. Effective collection and storage methods
(including enclosed and covered area) of site wastes would be required to
prevent waste materials from being blown around by wind, wastewater discharge
by flushing or leaching into the marine environment, or creating odour
nuisance or pest and vermin problem. |
Contractor |
All relevant worksites |
Implemented |
||
|
Land Contamination Measures |
|||||
|
|
|
For any excavation
works conducted at Radar Station |
|
|
|
|
AEIAR-130/2009 S3.6.57 |
AEIAR
130/2009 EM&A Manual S4.6 |
As the risk due to dermal contact with groundwater by site
workers is uncertain, it is recommended that personnel protective equipment
(PPE) be used by site workers as a mitigation measure. |
Contractor |
All relevant worksites |
Not Applicable |
|
Landscape and Visual Impact |
|||||
|
New Distributor
Roads Serving the Planned KTD |
|||||
|
|
|
Construction
Phase |
|
|
|
|
AEIAR-130/2009 S3.8.12 |
AEIAR
130/2009 EM&A Manual S2.8 |
All existing trees
should be carefully protected during construction. |
Contractor |
All
relevant worksites |
Not Applicable |
|
Trees unavoidably affected by the works should be
transplanted where practical. Detailed transplanting proposal will be
submitted to relevant government departments for approval in accordance with
ETWBC 2/2004 and 3/2006. Final locations of transplanted trees should be
agreed prior to commencement of the work. |
Contractor |
All
relevant worksites |
Not Applicable |
||
|
Control of
night-time lighting. |
Contractor |
All
relevant worksites |
Not Applicable |
||
|
Erection of
decorative screen hoarding. |
Contractor |
All
relevant worksites |
Implemented |
||
|
Trunk Road T2 |
|||||
|
|
|
Construction Phase |
|
|
|
|
AEIAR-174/2013 |
AEIAR-174/2013
EM&A Manual S7.2.1.2 |
All works shall be carefully designed to minimize impacts
on existing landscape resources and visually sensitive receivers. Existing
trees within works area shall be retained and protected. |
Contractor |
All relevant worksites |
Not Applicable |
|
Existing trees of good quality and condition that are
unavoidably affected by the works should be transplanted. |
Contractor |
All
relevant worksites |
Not Applicable |
||
|
Large temporary stockpiles of excavated material shall be
covered with unobtrusive |
Contractor |
All
relevant worksites |
Partially Implemented |
||
|
Construction plant and building material shall be orderly
and carefully stored in order to create a neat and tidy visual appearance. |
Contractor |
All
relevant worksites |
Implemented |
||
|
Erection of decorative screen hoarding should be designed
to be compatible with the existing urban context. |
Contractor |
All
relevant worksites |
Implemented |
||
|
All lighting in construction site shall be carefully
controlled to minimize light pollution and night-time glare to nearby
residences and GIC user. The contractor shall consider other security
measures, which shall minimize the visual impacts. |
Contractor |
All
relevant worksites |
Not Applicable |
||
|
General Condition |
|||||
|
|
|
The Permit Holder shall display conspicuously a copy of
this Permit on the Project site(s) at all vehicular site entrances/exits or
at a convenient location for public¡¦s information at all times. The Permit
Holder shall ensure that the most updated information about the Permit,
including any amended Permit, is displayed at such locations. If the Permit Holder surrenders a part
or the whole of the Permit, the notice he sends to the Director shall also be
displayed at the same locations as the original Permit. The suspended, varied or cancelled
Permit shall be removed from display at the Project site(s). |
Contractor |
All relevant worksites |
Implemented |
Implementation
status: Implemented / Partially Implemented / Not Implemented / Not Applicable
Appendix
K
Weather
and Meteorological Conditions during Reporting Month
|
Date |
Mean
Pressure (hPa) |
Air
Temperature |
Mean Relative Humidity (%) |
Total Rainfall (mm) |
||
|
Maximum (deg. C) |
Mean (deg. C) |
Minimum (deg. C) |
||||
|
February 2017 |
||||||
|
01 |
1021.3 |
22.0 |
18.4 |
16.6 |
80 |
Trace |
|
02 |
1022.7 |
17.7 |
16.8 |
16.2 |
83 |
Trace |
|
03 |
1020.3 |
19.6 |
17.1 |
15.4 |
76 |
0.0 |
|
04 |
1016.0 |
20.9 |
18.2 |
16.3 |
79 |
1.6 |
|
05 |
1013.9 |
22.0 |
19.0 |
16.7 |
83 |
3.3 |
|
06 |
1015.7 |
19.7 |
18.1 |
16.9 |
80 |
Trace |
|
07 |
1016.9 |
18.7 |
16.7 |
15.9 |
74 |
0.0 |
|
08 |
1016.6 |
20.6 |
17.7 |
15.5 |
78 |
Trace |
|
09 |
1020.2 |
16.8 |
14.0 |
11.1 |
56 |
Trace |
|
10 |
1023.3 |
15.6 |
12.8 |
10.8 |
56 |
0.0 |
|
11 |
1026.3 |
17.9 |
14.0 |
11.5 |
57 |
0.0 |
|
12 |
1026.7 |
19.1 |
15.0 |
12.5 |
66 |
0.0 |
|
13 |
1027.1 |
20.1 |
16.1 |
13.1 |
65 |
0.0 |
|
14 |
1028.2 |
21.1 |
17.3 |
15.6 |
62 |
0.0 |
|
15 |
1026.1 |
20.9 |
17.4 |
15.3 |
62 |
0.0 |
|
16 |
1021.6 |
24.0 |
18.7 |
15.4 |
69 |
0.0 |
|
17 |
1020.6 |
25.4 |
20.4 |
17.1 |
74 |
0.0 |
|
18 |
1021.2 |
24.1 |
19.9 |
18.0 |
76 |
0.0 |
|
19 |
1018.0 |
19.1 |
17.9 |
16.4 |
82 |
0.3 |
|
20 |
1013.9 |
25.5 |
21.0 |
18.3 |
84 |
Trace |
|
21 |
1017.1 |
21.1 |
18.3 |
16.6 |
90 |
4.6 |
|
22 |
1015.3 |
21.3 |
18.9 |
16.4 |
91 |
8.0 |
|
23 |
1017.4 |
20.2 |
17.9 |
15.0 |
88 |
Trace |
|
24 |
1022.1 |
15.1 |
13.0 |
12.0 |
81 |
Trace |
|
25 |
1020.9 |
13.8 |
12.2 |
10.7 |
85 |
0.7 |
|
26 |
1021.2 |
17.0 |
13.9 |
10.6 |
79 |
1.4 |
|
27 |
1022.5 |
19.8 |
17.0 |
15.4 |
66 |
0.0 |
|
28 |
1020.2 |
17.6 |
16.7 |
15.9 |
87 |
0.5 |
Source: Hong Kong Observatory
¡V Hong Kong Observatory
Appendix
L
Cumulative
statistics on Environmental Complaints, Notifications of Summons and Successful
Prosecution
Environmental
Complaints Log
|
Complaint Log No. |
Date of Notification |
Received From and Received By |
Nature of Complaint |
Date of Investigation |
Outcome |
Date of Reply |
|
1 |
15
December 2016 |
Andy Choy |
Air |
13
February 2017 |
Project-related |
13
February 2017 |
|
2 |
21 February 2017 |
Andy Choy |
Air |
22
February 2017 |
Not
Project-related |
7 March
2017 |
Cumulative
Statistics on Complaints
|
Environmental Parameters |
Cumulative No. Brought Forward |
No. of Complaints This Month |
Cumulative Project-to-Date |
|
Air |
1 |
1 |
2 |
|
Noise |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Water |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Waste |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Total |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Cumulative
Statistics on Notification of Summons and Successful Prosecutions
|
Environmental Parameters |
Cumulative No. Brought Forward |
No. of Notification of Summons and Prosecutions
This Month |
Cumulative Project-to-Date |
|
Air |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Noise |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Water |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Waste |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Total |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Appendix
M
Summary
of Site Audit in the Reporting Month
Summary
of Site Audit in the Reporting Month
|
Parameters |
Date |
Observations
and Recommendations |
Follow-up |
|
Air Quality |
9 February 2017 |
Open stockpile shall be covered with impermeable
sheeting to prevent dust emission. (Zone 4) |
The item was rectified by the Contractor and inspected
on 15 February 2017. |
|
23 February 2017 |
Open stockpile shall be covered with impermeable
sheeting to prevent dust emission. (Zone 4) |
The item was rectified by the
Contractor and inspected on 2 March 2017. |
|
|
Noise |
NA |
||
|
Water Quality |
23 February 2017 |
Channel between Zone 1 and
the Wetsep was blocked by silt or clay. Blockage should be cleared before the
wet season. (Zone 1) |
The item was rectified by the Contractor and inspected
on 2 March 2017. |
|
23 February 2017 |
Surface runoff shall be
prevented to enter public drainage or haul road. (Zone 4) |
The item was rectified by the
Contractor and inspected on 2 March 2017. |
|
|
Chemical and Waste Management |
NA |
||
|
Land Contamination |
2 February 2017 |
Breaker tips should be removed or stored on tray to
prevent land contamination. (Zone 2) |
The item was rectified by the Contractor and inspected
on 9 February 2017. |
|
Landscape and Visual Impact |
9 February
2017 |
Open stockpiles shall be
covered by unobtrusive sheeting to prevent dust and dirt spreading to
adjacent landscape areas and vegetation, and to create a neat and tidy visual
appearance. (Zone 4) |
The item was rectified by the Contractor and inspected on
15 February 2017. |
|
23 February 2017 |
Open stockpiles shall be
covered by unobtrusive sheeting to prevent dust and dirt spreading to
adjacent landscape areas and vegetation, and to create a neat and tidy visual
appearance. (Zone 4) |
The item was rectified by the Contractor and inspected
on 2 March 2017. |
|
|
General Condition |
9 February 2017 |
Proper wheel washing facilities in every vehicle exit
point shall be provided or otherwise to ensure no vehicle would exit. (Zone
2) |
The item was rectified by the Contractor and inspected
on 15 February 2017. |
|
23 February 2017 |
Proper wheel washing facilities in every vehicle exit
point shall be provided or otherwise to ensure no vehicle would exit. (Zone
3) |
The item was rectified by the
Contractor and inspected on 2 March 2017. |
|
Appendix
N
Outstanding
Issues and Deficiencies
Summary of Outstanding Issues and
Deficiencies in the Reporting Month
|
Parameters |
Outstanding
Issues |
Deficiencies |
|
Air Quality |
NA |
Any items of deficiencies can be referred to Appendix M. |
|
Noise |
NA |
|
|
Water Quality |
NA |
|
|
Chemical and Waste Management |
NA |
|
|
Land Contamination |
NA |
|
|
Landscape and Visual Impact |
NA |
|
|
General Condition |
NA |
|
|
Others |
NA |